250 word discussion response homeland security intel week 2

Responses should be a minimum of 250 words and include direct questions. You may challenge, support or supplement another studentâ€s answer using the terms, concepts and theories from the required readings. Also, do not be afraid to respectfully disagree where you feel appropriate; as this should be part of your analysis process at this academic level.
Forum posts are graded on timeliness, relevance, knowledge of the weekly readings, and the quality of original ideas. Sources utilized to support answers are to be cited in accordance with the APA writing style by providing a general parenthetical citation (reference the author, year and page number) within your post, as well as an adjoining reference list. Refer to grading rubric for additional details concerning grading criteria.
Respond to Michael:
Current relationships
The intelligence enterprise has grown significantly since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. I think the evolution of the relationship has somewhat been enhanced from the current approach to counterterrorism being mainly at the federal and national level to the local level. Nearly all terrorism that I have witnessed has been handled by the local responding jurisdiction. This is where the intelligence disconnect may be.
Following 9/11, the U.S. implemented significant changes and reform – partially due to the vividness factor – in how it looked at national security (Bartholomew, 2004). Not only did stopping terrorist attacks become a top priority issue but policymakers fundamentally altered U.S. national security infrastructure to address violent, asymmetric, non-state threats. The permanence (e.g. the creation of an entirely new department) of these alterations means that even as threats have evolved, the U.S. is reliant on institutions anchored to a specific moment in time. The White House then, almost immediately, deprived DHS of one of its primary, intended functions – strategic CT analysis – with the creation of the Terrorist Threat Integration Center, which, by way of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (IRTPA), became the National Counterterrorism Center. Creation of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), also via the IRTPA, capped this harried, CT-oriented restructuring.
As part of a bipartisan group of 27 organizations, the Brennan Center endorsed a series of recommendations for ways to strengthen House oversight of the Intelligence Community in the new Congress. The FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017, it does involve “some significant changes to 702.” What follows is a section-by-section summary of its provisions. For further background on the reauthorization debate, see resource page for the source cited and a review of last yearâ€s coverage will provide more insight, (United States: Statement by the Press Secretary, 2017).
Under Section 101, the attorney general and the director of national intelligence (DNI) are required to adopt procedures “consistent with the requirements of the fourth amendment” for querying information collected pursuant to Section 702 authority. According to Rogers, D. (2018), these procedures, which will govern searches designed to retrieve communications of or concerning U.S. persons, are subject to review by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). Though the specifics are for the most part left to be determined, the adopted procedures must include a record keeping of each “United States person query term” used. The biggest gaps of interoperability I can find is in the past five years, the IC has been using technology to break down barriers between agencies and to make intelligence data a community asset, the platform for data sharing and agencies also need to improve how they deliver data to the public by deploying more application program interfaces (APIs) that allow apps and websites to grab information from government databases and be distributed amongst each other. Data sharing between disparate agencies, especially when one departmentâ€s mission complements anotherâ€s, can further the governmentâ€s effectiveness.
Bartholomew, D. J. (2004). Measuring Intelligence: Facts and Fallacies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.barry.edu/log…
Rogers, D. (2018). Intelligence and Security Act 2017: A Preliminary Critique. New Zealand Law Review, (Issue 4), 657. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.barry.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edshol&AN=edshol.hein.journals.newzlndlr2018.35&site=eds-live
United States: Statement by the Press Secretary on the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017. (2018). Mena Report. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.barry.edu/log…

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post 250 word discussion response homeland security intel week 2 appeared first on Essay Writers.

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us

Dr. Padma Myers
Dr. Padma Myers
98% Success Rate
Read More
“Hello, I deliver nursing papers on time following instructions from the client. My primary goal is customer satisfaction. Welcome for plagiarism free papers”
Stern Frea
Stern Frea
98% Success Rate
Read More
Hi! I am an English Language and Literature graduate; I have written many academic essays, including argumentative essays, research papers, and literary analysis.
Dr. Ishid Elsa
Dr. Ishid Elsa
98% Success Rate
Read More
"Hi, count on me to deliver quality papers that meet your expectations. I write well researched papers in the fields of nursing and medicine".
Dr. Paul P. Klug
Dr. Paul P. Klug
99% Success Rate
Read More
"A top writer with proven reliability and experience. I have a 99% success rate, overall rating of 10. Hire me for quality custom written nursing papers. Thank you"

How Our Essay Writing Service Works

Tell Us Your Requirements

Fill out order details and instructions, then upload any files or additional materials if needed. Then, confirm your order by clicking “Place an Order.”

Make your payment

Your payment is processed by a secure system. We accept Mastercard, Visa, Amex, and Discover. We don’t share any informati.on with third parties

The Writing Process

You can communicate with your writer. Clarify or track order with our customer support team. Upload all the necessary files for the writer to use.

Download your paper

Check your paper on your client profile. If it meets your requirements, approve and download. If any changes are needed, request a revision to be done.

Recent Questions

Stay In Touch!

Leave your email and get discount promo codes and the best essay samples from our writers!