Option #2: Force Field Analysis
The deliverable for this assignment is a 2-3 page paper and a completed force field analysis. First, identify a common operational challenge (such as Emergency Room waiting time, Operating Room turn-over, timely patient discharge) in healthcare organizations and use the force field analysis tool to identify potential issues. Then, for the top issues, develop 2-3 tactics to address the challenges.
The paper should be well-written and meet the following requirements:
2-3 pages in length (excluding title and reference pages).
Formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Include at least three references from peer-reviewed articles. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find peer-reviewed articles.
Rubric
HCM410 Mod 3 CT
HCM410 Mod 3 CT
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Requirements
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
8.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Content
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the FMEA or FFA tool; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
8.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Critical Analysis
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis of the relevant operational issues.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis of the relevant operational issues.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis of the relevant operational issues.
8.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis of the relevant operational issues.
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Sources/ Examples
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria, but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
8.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Writing: Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
4.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Writing: Demonstrates proper use of APA style.
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
4.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
<a href=”https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/4864/modules/items/222749″ role=”button” class=”Button module-sequence-footer-button–previous” data-tooltip=”right” data-html-tooltip-title=” Module 3: Discussion Forum” aria-describedby=”msf1-previous-desc”>PreviousNext
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
The post 3 mod analysis appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.
