Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay Note: Please review the source guidelines below very carefully. If you do not choose fromthe provided sources below, this will cause a grading delay and you will need to resubmitthe assignment. For this assignment you will write your evaluation essay. You are required to submit only your final draft for this assignment (though we encourage all students to take advantage ofthe additional feedback a draft can provide). Use the graderâ€s feedback and the rubric tomake revisions to your draft before submitting the final. Your second draft will be graded. Now that you have completed Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, you are in a good positionto consider what critics have written about the novel. You will need a total of twocritiques (also known as critical analysis essays) for this assignment. First, use the selection of links below to locate a critical analysis essay written aboutthe 1818 version of Mary Shelley’s novel. You may focus most of your attention on thisfirst critique. Choose from among these sources: ïƒ¼ ipl2 Literary Criticism collection: If you use this site, you must choose from the first seven critiques listed as the final two are notscholarly: (http://www.ipl.org/div/litcrit/bin/litcrit.out.pl?… ïƒ¼ Professor Sherry Ginn’s critique:1http://www.clas.ufl.edu/ipsa/2003/ginn.html ïƒ¼ Professor Naomi Hetheringtonâ€s critique: http://knarf.english.upenn.edu/Articles/hether.htm… The questions in the study guides should have helped you evaluate this criticism inyour head. Now itâ€s time to write it down! Your evaluation may go more smoothly if you approach the guiding questions in thisorder: 1. Evaluate the critic/author: Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have (education, professional career, other publications, etc.)? (If you are using a credible author, you should be able to find her/his credentials fairly easily) 2. Find the thesis of the article: What is the thesis of the critical article youâ€ve chosen? What point does the author wantto make about Frankenstein? 3. Evaluate the thesis: 1 Note: You should avoid reading Ginnâ€s article too simplistically. A common misperception is that Ginn is arguing in favor of this novel being an autobiography, but if you read her article in full, you will find that this isnâ€t really the case. If you misinterpret your chosen source, it will affect your own arguments, so please read carefully. Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? Weâ€ve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you find points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisitingthe same ones the critics have chosen. 4. Evaluate the support: Whether you agree or disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide sufficientresearch from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes thesereferences valid? Do you feel the author uses this supportproperly? Next, locate a second critique about the novel that includes ideas somewhat similar (genre classification, for instance) to any of the discussions you have in your essay. The second critique can either support or refute any of the claims in your paper. The objective of this portion of the essay is to further support your opinion of the primary criticâ€s thesis or support. Therefore, for example, if you choose a secondary article that refutes any of your claims, you will need to counteract those ideas to bring the focus of your essay back in alignment with your essayâ€s thesis (your personal opinion of how the primary critic is either correct or incorrect in his or her thesis claim and/or how the first critic is either effective or ineffective in his or her support). Every discussion in this essay should ultimately support the claim you make in your thesis. For instance, if the first critic argues that Shelleyâ€swriting is juvenile, and if you agree, does the second critic also support this thesis? How so? If the second critic does not support your assessment of the first critic’s thesis, what evidence can you use from the text to argue that the second critic is incorrect? Consider another example: if the first critic believesthe novel is autobiographical, and if you disagree, does the second critic help you argue you own view of the first critic’s thesis? If so, how? Perhaps the second critic disagrees with your view and feels the novel is autobiographical–if that’s the case, be prepared to use evidence from the text to refute the second criticâ€s thesis and support your own argument. Using two critiques in this way will allow you to create a polished, comprehensive Evaluation Essay that allows you to connect your own ideas to those of seasoned critics. In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims are supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen,the novel, Frankenstein, and/or the study guides. Using proper MLA2 style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques; youare not required to cite the study guides if you use them. Helpful Hints: For a thesis statement, try answering a question like: How and how well does thispiece of criticism state and support its argument regarding Frankenstein? You might use these as possible guidelines in crafting your thesis statement: (Critic, aka author of the critique) uses (add critic title) to (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as â€œadequatelyâ€ or â€œinadequatelyâ€) argue that (add criticâ€s thesis) by (explain why and/or include yoursupport). OR (Critic)â€s (add critique title) (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument suchas â€œadequatelyâ€ or â€œinadequatelyâ€) argue that (add criticâ€s thesis) because (explain why and/orinclude your support). More specific thesis examples: John Smith uses “Frankenstein Critique Essay” to adequately argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster by coddling Victor as a boy. OR John Smith’s “Frankenstein Critique Essay” does not effectively argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster because the novel Frankenstein too strongly supports inherent good or bad, which means nurturing roles cannot be held responsible. The guidelines for this assignment are as follows: Length: This assignment should be at least 750 words. Header: Include a header in the upper left-hand corner of your writing assignment with the following information: Your first and last name Course Title (Composition II) Assignment name (Evaluation Essay) Current Date Format: MLA-style source documentation and Works Cited 3 Your last name and page number in the upper-right corner of each page Double-spacing throughout Standard font (TimesNewRoman, Calibri) Title, centered after heading 1â€ margins on all sides Save the file using one of the following extensions: .docx, .doc, .rtf, or .txt Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph. Reminder: You need at least two critiques in addition to the novel in Works Cited in order to receive the highest score. In other words, you need three sources total in cited in the essay and on the Works Cited page in order to earn the maximum points in the corresponding column on the grading rubric. Failure to meet the source minimum will result in a severe decrease in your grade.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
The post evaluation-10 appeared first on Quality Nursing Writers.