Course Title: Creating a Sustainable Legacy: Healthy Communities
Competency Assessment Title: Financial Strategies for the Sustainability Initiative
Assignment Directions
Your Financial Strategies Summary provides organization executives with reasons why they should approve financial strategies for your
sustainability initiative. It demonstrates your ability to critically think through financial strategy development and presents your financial petition to
leadership for resources for implementation.
Prepare the Financial Strategies Summary for your sustainability initiative in 6 to 8 pages.
Include the following in your summary:
• A brief summary of your sustainability initiative proposal
• A minimum of 3 financial strategies to fund implementation of your initiative
o An analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of each of your financial strategies for implementation of your
initiative
o An evaluation of how each of the following impacts those financial strategies within your initiative:
o Proposed community partnerships
o Proposed waste reduction efforts
o Proposed improved patient care outcomes
• Petition to the leadership for approval of your financial strategies to enact the initiative
• Cite 3 reputable references to support your assignment (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly
works, or other sources of similar quality).
Format your references according to APA guidelines.
Submit your assignment.
Resources
• Center for Writing Excellence
• Reference and Citation Generator
• Grammar Assistance
• Annotated Bibliography Template
MHACB/560 Competency 3 Rubric
Page 2 of 2
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Competency Assessment Rubric
Assignment/Performance
Criteria
Mastery
100%
Meets Expectations
85%
Not Met
0%
- Sustainability Initiative
Proposal Summary
(weight 10%)
The summary included a thorough
summation of the sustainability initiative
proposal.
The summary included an
adequate summation of the
sustainability initiative proposal.
The summary did not include a
summation of the sustainability
initiative proposal. - Financial Strategies to
Fund Implementation
(weight 40%)
The summary included a thorough
analysis of the strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats for a minimum
of 3 financial strategies to fund the
initiative implementation; and a
comprehensive evaluation of how the
proposed community partnerships,
proposed waste reduction efforts, and
the proposed improved patient care
outcomes impact the financial strategies
within the initiative.
The summary included an
adequate analysis of the strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities, and
threats for a minimum of 3 financial
strategies to fund the initiative
implementation; and a satisfactory
evaluation of how the proposed
community partnerships, proposed
waste reduction efforts, and the
proposed improved patient care
outcomes impact the financial
strategies within the initiative.
The summary did not include the
analysis of the strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities, and
threats for a minimum of 3
financial strategies to fund the
initiative implementation, or the
evaluation of how the proposed
community partnerships, proposed
waste reduction efforts, and the
proposed improved patient care
outcomes impact the financial
strategies within the initiative. - Petition for Approval
of the Financial
Strategies
(weight 40%)
The summary included a comprehensive
petition to the leadership for approval of
the financial strategies necessary to
enact the initiative.
The summary included a partial
petition to the leadership for
approval of the financial strategies
to enact the initiative.
The summary did not include the
petition to the leadership for
approval of the financial strategies
to enact the initiative. - Research Support
(weight 5%)
The student cited 3 reputable references
to support the assignment (e.g., trade or
industry publications, government or
agency websites, scholarly works, or
other sources of similar quality).
The student cited 2 reputable
references to support the
assignment (e.g., trade or industry
publications, government or
agency websites, scholarly works,
or other sources of similar quality).
The student did not cite any
references. - Grammar and Writing
Mechanics
(weight 5%)
Accuracy in grammar, sentence
structures, sentence boundaries, and
word choice enhanced content.
Rare inaccuracies/errors in
grammar, sentence structures,
sentence boundaries, and word
choice did not detract from the
content.
Occasional or frequent
inaccuracies/errors in grammar,
sentence structures, sentence
boundaries, and word choice
detracted from the content.
